User contributions for Achim1999
A user with 1,089 edits. Account created on 5 June 2009.
15 October 2012
- 22:1122:11, 15 October 2012 diff hist +6 Bernoulli number →Connection with Stirling numbers of the second kind: calculate the formula for k=1
13 October 2012
- 20:5820:58, 13 October 2012 diff hist +530 Talk:Antiderivative →Who coined this term "antiderivation"?: new section
- 20:0620:06, 13 October 2012 diff hist +3 Genus of a multiplicative sequence →Todd genus: Index wrong (2 missed)
28 September 2012
- 16:1616:16, 28 September 2012 diff hist +241 Euler–Maclaurin formula →Derivation by functional analysis: symmetric formula --- same limits for for the sum as the points of functions evaluation!
20 September 2012
- 00:0200:02, 20 September 2012 diff hist +1 m Prime number more common wording?
19 September 2012
- 23:5923:59, 19 September 2012 diff hist +95 Prime number trivial reason mentioned
- 23:5023:50, 19 September 2012 diff hist +497 Number →Classification of numbers: why were the prime numbers forgoten?
- 21:2221:22, 19 September 2012 diff hist +177 National flag →Unusual flags: Flag of Togo mentioned!!
10 July 2012
- 22:2122:21, 10 July 2012 diff hist +201 m Conway's Game of Life →Examples of patterns: old reference given for census of moving objects (new one is inaccessable)
- 11:0111:01, 10 July 2012 diff hist +303 User talk:Achim1999 →List of nuclides -- sorted by half-life: sorry, you only support my decision to withdraw my seriously support on scientific qualitiy (too much time wast for me)
- 10:5610:56, 10 July 2012 diff hist +1,210 User talk:Sbharris →List of nuclides -- sorted by half-life: wikipedia is unable to get a scientific high quality level with your attitude I fear.
- 10:4210:42, 10 July 2012 diff hist +675 User talk:Sbharris →List of nuclides -- sorted by half-life: Are you unable to stay on a objective scale - I think not? :-/ This "short-living natural" does harm to the structure of the article, this is the bad thing!
- 10:3410:34, 10 July 2012 diff hist +287 User talk:Sbharris →List of nuclides -- sorted by half-life: proton-decay is highly speculative -- for free protons!
9 July 2012
- 23:3323:33, 9 July 2012 diff hist +2,254 User talk:Sbharris →List of nuclides -- sorted by half-life: Why have people so great difficulties to stay really objective on wikipedia? :-/
- 21:1921:19, 9 July 2012 diff hist +1,847 User talk:Sbharris →List of nuclides -- sorted by half-life: new section
- 19:1819:18, 9 July 2012 diff hist +306 User talk:EmilJ/Archive 4 →Area of Kosovo wanted: new section
28 June 2012
- 20:2720:27, 28 June 2012 diff hist +566 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics →sorry, but I'm very annoyed: there is a proverb: "it becomes dangerous if silly people gets busy" - sorry, not very diplomatic
- 20:1820:18, 28 June 2012 diff hist +181 Talk:Diophantine approximation →take the mathematical view: short and precise
- 20:0520:05, 28 June 2012 diff hist +3 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics →sorry, but I'm very annoyed: typos
- 20:0420:04, 28 June 2012 diff hist +1,387 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics →sorry, but I'm very annoyed: new section
- 19:3619:36, 28 June 2012 diff hist +26 m Talk:Diophantine approximation →don't talk and die here, but build up the article (and then die) :-): wording/typo
- 19:3319:33, 28 June 2012 diff hist +2 m Talk:Diophantine approximation →don't talk and die here, but build up the article (and then die) :-): indent
- 19:3219:32, 28 June 2012 diff hist +625 Talk:Diophantine approximation →don't talk and die here, but build up the article (and then die) :-): there is a proverb: "it becomes dangerous if the silly people gets busy"
- 19:1919:19, 28 June 2012 diff hist −20 Diophantine approximation Undid revision 499797901 by Achim1999 (talk)where are the semiconvergent left? deleted?? :-(
- 19:1019:10, 28 June 2012 diff hist +20 Diophantine approximation →Basic Diophantine approximation: I always feel bad, if people with insufficient knowledge knows it better :-(
27 June 2012
- 17:4717:47, 27 June 2012 diff hist +4 m Sternberg →Places: wikilink
- 17:4617:46, 27 June 2012 diff hist +35 Sternberg →Places: wiki-link was already used
- 17:4417:44, 27 June 2012 diff hist +93 Sternberg →Places: County of Sternberg of Germany added
26 June 2012
- 16:3316:33, 26 June 2012 diff hist +196 Line (geometry) Added a basic fact clearly. I think it is a very bad habbit to do a quick "only-reversion" which the reason "I think this one is better .... a subjective personal opinion is given" :-/ Why do you act thereby like a dictator?
25 June 2012
- 23:1323:13, 25 June 2012 diff hist −5 m User talk:Achim1999 →Parenthetical referencing: relative "very", people are "sensetive" on bad decisions
- 23:0923:09, 25 June 2012 diff hist +582 User talk:Achim1999 →Parenthetical referencing: bad checkable statements and references wanted?
- 20:4220:42, 25 June 2012 diff hist +16 No-three-in-line problem →Literature: Good arcticles have many references, bad article few :-/
- 20:4120:41, 25 June 2012 diff hist +1 No-three-in-line problem →References: These are not references, this is a literature list! :-(
- 20:3920:39, 25 June 2012 diff hist +12 No-three-in-line problem →External links: no reflist :-/
- 20:3820:38, 25 June 2012 diff hist +66 No-three-in-line problem →Conjectured upper bounds: better date of the discovery, and reference! (R.K.Guy, one of the original authors, knew it at least in Oct 2004)
- 20:2320:23, 25 June 2012 diff hist +69 Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: preciser explanated what I meant (and you miss)
- 20:1920:19, 25 June 2012 diff hist +535 Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: sorry, you failed again, and I stop teaching you. bye
- 09:5609:56, 25 June 2012 diff hist +17 Line (geometry) stay objectively ;-)
- 09:5409:54, 25 June 2012 diff hist +133 Line (geometry) see the beautifull of the simplicity ;)
- 09:3909:39, 25 June 2012 diff hist +66 Line (geometry) Undid revision 499211094 by David Eppstein (talk)Sorry, we need no axiomization from order-theory in simple geometry (here)!!! Also the intuitive notion seem better understandable
- 09:3009:30, 25 June 2012 diff hist +339 Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: why people don't see the simplicity ?
- 09:2609:26, 25 June 2012 diff hist +312 Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: wrong or better missed understanding
- 09:2109:21, 25 June 2012 diff hist 0 m Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: repaired sentence insertation
- 09:1909:19, 25 June 2012 diff hist +990 Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: last try (else ask a math-professor) :-/
- 00:0000:00, 25 June 2012 diff hist +4 m Line (geometry) wording/expression
24 June 2012
- 22:2722:27, 24 June 2012 diff hist −10 m Line (geometry) better image to visualize the facts
- 21:5221:52, 24 June 2012 diff hist +72 Line (geometry) please correct my wording if uncommon
- 21:2121:21, 24 June 2012 diff hist −5 m Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: grammar
- 18:0318:03, 24 June 2012 diff hist +320 Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: recognize the logic / philosophy behind
- 17:5717:57, 24 June 2012 diff hist +444 Talk:Line (geometry) →Ray nonsense in the current article: these are facts, not phantasys or my personal preference! ;)
