User contributions for 70.247.174.3

16 September 2015

• 02:2302:23, 16 September 2015 diff hist +8‎ 1/N expansion ‎ link

15 September 2015

• 02:1702:17, 15 September 2015 diff hist +4‎ Neutrino ‎ link
• 01:0001:00, 15 September 2015 diff hist +56‎ Representation theory ‎ →‎See also

14 September 2015

• 02:2602:26, 14 September 2015 diff hist +11‎ Magnetic monopole ‎ what is a mass bound? upper or lower bound? Where is this derived?
• 01:5201:52, 14 September 2015 diff hist +35‎ Magnetic monopole ‎ clarify

13 September 2015

• 20:5820:58, 13 September 2015 diff hist +4‎ Old quantum theory ‎ link
• 20:2520:25, 13 September 2015 diff hist +4‎ Ramond–Ramond field ‎ link
• 20:2120:21, 13 September 2015 diff hist +4‎ Dirac string ‎ link
• 20:2020:20, 13 September 2015 diff hist +25‎ Dirac quantization condition ‎ independent possibilities
• 04:3004:30, 13 September 2015 diff hist +10‎ Majorana fermion ‎ the distinction seems to be due to mass generation mechanisms
• 04:2504:25, 13 September 2015 diff hist +4‎ Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector ‎ link
• 02:2402:24, 13 September 2015 diff hist 0‎ Majorana fermion ‎ allow for link resolution
• 02:2202:22, 13 September 2015 diff hist +7‎ Majorana fermion ‎ what? does exhibit here mean evidence? Isn't this a speculative statement anyway, as SUSY is not considred canon?
• 01:5301:53, 13 September 2015 diff hist +22‎ Majorana fermion ‎ potential confusion
• 01:5201:52, 13 September 2015 diff hist +31‎ Majoron ‎ potential for confusion

12 September 2015

• 21:0121:01, 12 September 2015 diff hist +9‎ Weyl semimetal ‎ →‎Experimental discovery
• 18:3218:32, 12 September 2015 diff hist +313‎ Talk:Chirality (physics) ‎ →‎Merger proposal
• 18:2218:22, 12 September 2015 diff hist +25‎ P-symmetry ‎No edit summary
• 02:2102:21, 12 September 2015 diff hist +11‎ Monstrous moonshine ‎ this statement is a non-sequitur--field theories are physical theories, the monster group, modular functions, etc., are abstract theories. Physical theories can't "lie behind" abstract theories.

11 September 2015

• 20:5220:52, 11 September 2015 diff hist −30‎ Antiparticle ‎ simplify rationale for QFT
• 20:4020:40, 11 September 2015 diff hist +23‎ Antiparticle ‎ Paragraph is confusing. No explanation given for the problem remaining, despite saying there is a solution. No consequential details for putative solution mentioned.
• 20:3520:35, 11 September 2015 diff hist +22‎ Antiparticle ‎ did he, or didn't he argue these points? Did he try and fail?
• 20:3320:33, 11 September 2015 diff hist +9‎ Antiparticle ‎ rephrase sentence to be less awkward, and clarifying emphasis on this being a problem
• 20:2520:25, 11 September 2015 diff hist +11‎ Antiparticle ‎ these solutions have changed over time? this paragraph seems to imply some contextual era, without specifying it, or the dominant assumptions of the time
• 20:1620:16, 11 September 2015 diff hist −4‎ Antiparticle ‎ there is no "the" graviton, as it there are multiple distinct theories, and no conclusive evidence
• 18:4018:40, 11 September 2015 diff hist +25‎ Supersymmetric gauge theory ‎ minor tweaks
• 18:1818:18, 11 September 2015 diff hist +14‎ Supersymmetric gauge theory ‎ reads as a textbook
• 18:0518:05, 11 September 2015 diff hist −9‎ Monster Lie algebra ‎ NPOV and fact checking