Judicial absurdity

A judicial absurdity is the anomalous evaluation that a judge commits in a judicial pronouncement, on matters of fact. It is the serious and ostensible error that is committed in the conceptualization, judgment or reasoning when analyzing, interpreting and evaluating the evidence or the facts capable of becoming so, with misrepresentation of the rules of sound criticism in violation of the applicable procedural norms, All of which results in a contradictory or incoherent conclusion in the formal logical order and unsustainable in axiological discrimination.