Colorado Party (Uruguay)

format_list_bulleted Contenido keyboard_arrow_down
ImprimirCitar

The Colorado Party is a Uruguayan political party that emerged in 1836. Together with the National Party, it is one of the traditional parties of Uruguay.

Founded on November 19, 1836, it is the second oldest party in the country, only 3 months younger than the PN. It is also the party that has governed Uruguay the longest, counting 139 years of national government leadership, albeit interrupted, since its foundation. Its longest continuous period was 94 years, spanning the second half of the 19th century and the first half of the XX, more precisely, between February 20, 1865, with the beginning of the interim term of Venancio Flores, and March 1, the 1959, with the beginning of the first white collegiate of 1959-1963.

Historically it encompassed sectors of very diverse ideologies, such as Batllismo, liberalism, republicanism, Krausism, social democracy, conservatism and pragmatism, adopting positions on the spectrum that goes from the political center to the right politics.

History

Origins and evolution

It has its origins in the confrontations between the leaders of the independence of 1825. In 1836 the supporters of President Manuel Oribe and the group that supports Fructuoso Rivera (president between 1830-1834) clashed. In the battle of Carpintería, the colors of the currencies that later identify each political group arise. The White Party, Oribe's supporters, and the Colorado Party, led by Rivera, which make up a bipartisanship that lasted until the end of the century XX.

From 1865 to 1959, the Colorado Party successively held the Presidency of the Republic. Historically, the colorados represented the interests of the popular urban groups of the city of Montevideo, immigrant groups and the opening to the European. While their historical opponents, the whites, had their base in the rural environment (interior of Uruguay) and the interests of the common people and the landowners.

With the election of José Batlle y Ordóñez in 1903, an avant-garde program of social demands (the social question) and economic demands (development of state companies) began that democratized and guaranteed a certain level of participation of the white opposition and the creation of a welfare state and secular.

As of that date, the factions of the Colorado party organized themselves in opposition (right) or expansion (left) of the ideas of batllismo. This accentuates the process that characterizes the party more as a motto, that is, a grouping of political factions that share the name of the electoral list but that compete through parallel lists in the election of positions. Each submotto (factions or political groups) adds their votes to the national list or motto. Identical process but under different circumstances both whites and the party known as the Broad Front experience.

The Latorre-Santos dynasty

Between 1875 and 1886 the country was governed directly or indirectly by two Colorado soldiers, Latorre, who had a lot of influence on President Varela, and Santos, who also had a lot of influence on President Vidal, who ruled for a few years. Both governments were characterized by the decrease in public debt and the budget for the army, the latter occurred especially in the Latorre government, which was more austere than Santos. Among the positive aspects of both governments were the school reform of José P. Varela and the beginning of the separation of the State from the Catholic Church. There were many complaints of persecution of the opposition, especially the press. Santos won immediate re-election by crafting a complex legal strategy that included the creation of the Flores department. His second period was 177 days. In August 1886 he suffered an attack and had to resign to go to Europe to cure his ailments. Both Latorre and Santos are exiled by law and die abroad.

The Batlle Dynasty

One of the most famous political families of the Colorado Party, the Batlles, have given the country four presidents, one per generation. The first was Lorenzo Batlle, who ruled between 1868 and 1872. He had to face a serious economic crisis that arose in 1868 and the uprising of the nationalist Timoteo Aparicio.

The second was José Batlle y Ordóñez, son of the former, who ruled between 1903 and 1907 and between 1911 and 1915. His social, electoral and economic reforms led Uruguay to be "The Switzerland of America". Among them are the abolition of the death penalty, the divorce law by the sole will of the woman, the removal of crucifixes from public hospitals, the separation of the State and the Catholic Church, the creation of the School for the Blind and the eight hour day.

The third was Luis Batlle Berres, nephew of the former, he was vice president for a few months and then became president when the incumbent died in 1946, he governed until 1950. His period was known as neobatllismo. He was the most influential member of the National Administration Council elected in 1955. He had to face a harsh economic crisis that put an end to the Colorado Party's 93 years in power.

The fourth is Jorge Batlle Ibáñez, son of the previous one, he was a five-time candidate for the presidency, he was the first president elected by ballot, he had to face a severe economic crisis in 2002.

Other members of the Batlle family have been elected senators or representatives. The three brothers César, Lorenzo and Rafael Batlle Pacheco, sons of José Batlle y Ordóñez and cousins of Luis Batlle Berres, with whom they maintained a long political rivalry that manifested itself in the electoral bid between lists 14 and 15, stood out. José Amorin Batlle, Jorge Batlle's nephew, was elected deputy in 2004, senator in 2009, and was a pre-candidate for the presidency of the Republic on list 15, coming in second place with 14% of the vote.

The five-year period 2005-2010

After the results of the 2004 elections, the Colorado Party became the third political group in parliamentary terms after the Broad Front and the National Party, obtaining 10.36% of the vote, the lowest vote of its history.

It has representation in both chambers and 17 of the 19 departmental boards. In the last poll carried out by Equipos Mori in June 2006, the Colorado Party registered a 23% approval rating for its performance as the opposition. According to the Equipos Mori poll of March 2008, Julio María Sanguinetti had a 27% approval rating and Jorge Batlle 18%. According to the Equipos Mori survey of May 2008, Julio María Sanguinetti had a 23% approval rating and Jorge Batlle 15%.

A new group called Vamos Uruguay was created, led by Pedro Bordaberry, which at the end of 2008 reached 58% within the Colorado Party. Within its sector are: Young Alternative (Fernando Amado), Authentic Democracy (Nicolás Ortiz De Lucía), Independent Alternative (Fitzgerald Cantero), among other groups.

On Saturday, May 17, 2008, an assembly of list 15 proclaimed José Amorín Batlle as pre-candidate for the presidency for the Colorado Party. The event was held at the Platense Patín Club, where hundreds of leaders from all over the country met. Amorín disputed the candidacy with the former Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries, Martín Aguirrezabala, who formed his own movement within list 15, the “Movimiento 15 de Mayo”.

In June 2008, the pre-candidate for Vamos Uruguay, Pedro Bordaberry, presented to the President of the Republic and the Minister of the Interior 50 measures to combat insecurity. Among them, the creation of a map of crimes for the prevention and effectiveness of the police stands out. President Tabaré Vázquez told him that there are several proposals on security that are in the process of being applied by the Ministry of the Interior and others that correspond to parliament. Interior Minister Daisy Tourné rejected the proposal to lower the age of majority for violent crimes.

On July 15, 2008, Luis Hierro López was designated pre-presidential candidate by the Batllista Forum. Hierro had the support of Julio María Sanguinetti and Tabaré Viera, Rivera's mayor. Washington Abdala moved away from the sector, founding his own group & # 34; Podemos Más & # 34;.

On August 5, 2008, the Lower House rejected a proposal to pay homage to former Colorado president Jorge Pacheco Areco. The proposal, promoted by the Colorado Party, received the support of the National Party, totaling 45 votes, which were not enough since the Broad Front voted against it.

On August 20, 2008, the Lower House approved the impeachment of deputy Carlos Signorelli, former mayor of Artigas for the Colorado Party. This was the second violation of a legislator since the return to democracy in 1985 (the first was that of the Frente Amplio legislator José Germán Araújo in 1986). The challenge was approved with 83 votes out of 91 present. The legislators present from the Broad Front, the National Party and the Colorados Washington Abdala (Podemos Más) and Germán Cardoso (Vamos Uruguay) spoke in favor. The remaining 7 Colorado deputies spoke against (excluding Carlos Signorelli himself).

Carlos Signorelli had already had his party rights suspended on December 13, 2006 by the National Executive Committee (CEN), following a report presented by the party's Ethics and Disciplinary Commission. On that occasion, the CEN had assessed that Signorelli had acted in a way that was at odds "with the tradition in the ways of doing politics of the Colorado Party".

Ideas

Originally, the Colorado Party was linked to the Argentine Unitary Party and the Brazilian separatists who created the Republic of Rio Grande do Sul. Unitarism derived from the centralism of the times of independence and the model of the centralized state offered by the First French Empire of Napoleon Bonaparte. The Unitarians were a group made up mostly of the elite, members of the upper class, intellectuals, and the military. The colorados sought the supremacy of Montevideo against the interior of the country, supported by the National Party. In the economic aspect, they defended liberalism, free trade, free navigation of rivers by European ships, the modernization of the financial system through the creation of a bank issuing paper money and the contracting of loans for the execution of works. For this reason, the first Colorados are known as the Uruguayan liberals.

However, at the beginning of the XX century, Batlle y Ordóñez created a new current within the party. For many years Batllismo was opposed by Riverismo, a colorada current contrary to the statist position of Batllismo and which aspired to a party more linked to classical liberalism. Riverismo was also in favor of a one-person Executive Branch "that would really govern" and opposed to the collegiate executive model of Batllismo. Its main leader was Pedro Manini Ríos, who expressed himself through the morning newspaper La Mañana.

The appearance of Batllismo represented a resounding change in the physiognomy of the party. Batllismo draws on various ideological sources from Krausism, republicanism and radicalism. During the last decades, it was very common to make a simplification: "to be colorado is to be a batllista". In fact, Batllismo stained practically the entire party with its preaching and action; If you see the names of the various sectors in electoral acts, the reference to Batlle is common: Batllismo Unido, Unión Colorada y Batllista, Vanguardia Batllista, Corriente Batllista Independiente, Batllismo Radical, Movimiento de Reaffirmación Batllista, etc. The figure of Batlle y Ordóñez is considered a patrimony of the entire party by politicians and adherents of very different positions, by people from the center, from the right and from the left (also outside the Colorado Party). In addition, for decades, it was common to hear it said in Uruguay that "the Colorado Party is the only one qualified to govern", which shows the intense identification that this party had with government action. All this going to the extreme of defending the state secret as an imperative need, contrary to the traditional white idiosyncrasy, characterized by exhibiting public discussions and fights almost as a registered trademark.

News

Currently the Colorado Party is divided on social issues such as abortion, euthanasia, voting by letter, the decriminalization of marijuana and the rights of homosexuals (marriage, civil union, gender identity law and adoption law), which can be observed in the voting on these issues in parliament.

During the 2005-2010 legislature, Julio María Sanguinetti was the only Colorado legislator to vote for the Sexual and Reproductive Health bill (vetoed by the Executive Power) that sought to legalize abortion and for the Law of Commonwealth (in force since 2008). In 2011, the Vamos Uruguay sector approved party discipline to vote against the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy project agreed upon by 49 representatives of the Broad Front and an independent legislator. The only two legislators from Vamos Uruguay who voted against party discipline were the then General Secretary of the Colorado Party, Senator Ope Pasquet, and Deputy Fernando Amado, who, despite being in favor of the project, complied with the resolution, a A year later, in December 2012, all the Colorado deputies present at the time the Equal Marriage Law was voted in favor of it.

Regarding the other reforms carried out by the Broad Front government, the Colorado Party opposed the reintroduction of the personal income tax (IRPF) and began a campaign to collect signatures to promote a constitutional amendment that the personal income tax on retirement and pensions will be rendered null and void. Given that said section of the tax was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Justice, in 2008 the government approved a substitute law that created the Social Security Assistance Tax (IASS). Despite this, the Colorado Party continued with the collection of signatures, since it is against any tax on passivities. Finally, the required signatures were not achieved, since only 40,000 were reached.

In 2007, the "Movimiento Plancha", vote sheet 666, was founded, made up of people who suffered from social exclusion. Its main objective was to fight for the application of laws against employment discrimination and the integration into society of strongly excluded people, such as slum dwellers, homosexuals and Afro-descendants. In the Colorado youth elections held on December 1, 2007, they obtained 348 votes, almost 1% of the votes cast in that election.

In 2011, the Vamos Uruguay sector launched a campaign to collect signatures to lower the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years. In the first two months, 170,000 signatures were collected and various surveys show at least 60% of the population in favor of said measure.

In the years 2010 and 2011, the Broad Front promoted the annulment of the Expiration Law, the position of the Colorado Party being unfavorable to its annulment, with some minorities in favor of its repeal and/or annulment, such as the leader Diego Fau, who supported the collection of signatures that sought to annul the law by constitutional plebiscite, failing by a narrow margin. Diego Fau's position on the issue was the first that achieved media coverage since 1986, when a Colorado deputy, Víctor Vaillant, voted against the approval of said law.

The following table shows the opinion of Colorado voters on various parliamentary proposals presented from 2005 to date.

Item (Consultation) Date of survey Okay. Dissent You don't think.
Tax Reform (Cifra.) August 2007 12% 68% 10%
Cancellation of the Law of expiry (Cifra.) June 2011 20% 61 per cent 19%
Equal Marriage (Equipos.) August 2019 46% 30% 24 per cent
Decriminalization of abortion (Cifra.) October 2009 46% 36% 18%
Lower the age of imputability. (Cifra.) October 2012 77% 19% 4%
Security reform (Cifra.)
(nightly confinements, life-review, creation of a special police group with military personnel, and impossibility of release benefits for repeat offenders).
August 2019 65 per cent
Legalization of the sale of marijuana (Equipos.) August 2019 12% 72% 16%
Integral law for trans persons (Opción Consultores.) December 2018 11% 82% 7%

Proposals for Constitutional Amendment by collecting signatures

Since it was in opposition in 2004, the Colorado Party as a whole or some of its sub-mottos have attempted to bring two constitutional amendment proposals to a vote by collecting signatures (10% of those qualified are required). The first proposal foundered due to lack of signatures and the second will be submitted to a popular vote in October 2014, together with the next presidential elections. The Colorado Party had not promoted a collection of signatures since 1966, when it was in opposition to the last collegiate government presided over by the National Party.

Amendment to Article 67 of the Constitution

In 2007, the Batllista Forum announced the beginning of the collection of signatures to prohibit taxes on passive activities and thus repeal the Tax on Social Security Assistance (I.A.S.S) created by the Broad Front after the Tax on Income was declared unconstitutional income to Individuals in the case of retirement (with contradictory rulings of the Supreme Court after the change of one of its ministers) as well as any other tax. By February 2008, the collection of signatures reached 20,000 just from the members of the Foro Batllista. In August 2008, Sanguinetti criticized the demobilization of the signature collectors after the creation of the Social Security Assistance Tax. In September 2008, Luis Hierro announced that between 30,000 and 45,000 signatures had been collected. Finally, the plebiscite was not held since not enough signatures were collected. The text proposed adding the following to article 67 of the Constitution: "Add to article 67 of the Constitution of the Republic the following paragraph: "Retirements, pensions, withdrawals and passive benefits of a similar nature, may not constitute an event that generates any tax, whatever its nature"

Amendment to Article 43 of the Constitution

In 2009, a commission promoting a constitutional amendment to lower the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years for all crimes presented on Tuesday, April 17, 2012, more than 350,000 signatures (the minimum required to call a popular consultation is about 250,000 signatures), which require verification by the Electoral Court before the call for a plebiscite is approved.

The 350 boxes containing the signatures were presented to the president of the General Assembly, Danilo Astori in parliament.

The proposed reform establishes the protection of crime victims as a priority and aims to lower the age of criminal prosecution of adolescents to 16 years in cases of homicide, serious injury, robbery, extortion, kidnapping and rape, as well as other crimes.

In addition, it seeks to maintain the records of minors who have violated the law when they reach the age of 18, and to create a specialized rehabilitation institute independent of the Institute for Children and Adolescents of Uruguay (INAU).

The campaign to collect signatures was organized by the National and Colorado parties (PC, center right) and led by former president (1990-1995) and senator for the National Party (PN) Luis Alberto Lacalle and Colorado senator Pedro Bordaberry.

The so-called "National Commission to Live in Peace-I sign" It was also made up of relatives of crime victims and merchants.

The ruling Broad Front (left), the Independent Party and the National Alliance sector of the National Party demonstrated against the reform project, as well as social organizations grouped in the "National Commission No to the Lowering" 3. 4;.

In June 2011, according to the polling firm Cifra, 65% of Uruguayans agreed with lowering the age of criminal prosecution, 28% disagreed and 7% had no opinion. The approval of this measure was the majority among the voters of the FA (55%). Among whites the level of support was 73% and among Colorados 84%.

In March 2012, according to the polling firm Interconsult, 66% of the Uruguayan population agreed to lower the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years, 27% were against the initiative and 7% does not know. Voters of the traditional parties, residents in the interior of the country and people with a lower educational level are the most prone to this measure. On the contrary, the greatest resistance is found among the voters of the Broad Front, Montevideans, and the inhabitants with more years of formal education. However, according to this survey, more than half of those who declare themselves to be a front supporter approve of lowering the age of criminal responsibility. On the other hand, the majority of those surveyed (72%) believe that minors have a very important incidence in the concretion of crimes, compared to 15% who believe that they have little or nothing.

The following table shows the opinion of Colorado voters on lowering the age of criminal prosecution according to the various surveys.

Consultant Date Down at 14 years Go down at age 16 Leave the way it is. You don't know.
Mori equipment May 2009 48% 34% 12% 4%
Consultant Date Totally agreed Something agrees Something disagreed Totally disagreed You don't know.
Radar Group December 2010 62% 19% 8% 6% 5%
Consultant Date Okay. Dissent You don't know.
Figure June 2011 84% 12% 4%

The text of the proposed amendment establishes the following:

Transitory and Special Provisions

Add the following:

Article 1. Substitute article 43 and transitory and special provision B of the Constitution of the Republic, which will be worded as follows:

“Article 43. The law will establish the protection of crime victims as a priority.

Persons over the age of sixteen and under the age of eighteen will be criminally responsible and will be punished in accordance with the provisions of the Penal Code (Law 9,155 of December 4, 1933 and its amendments), for the intentional commission of the crimes of homicide, especially aggravated homicide, very especially aggravated homicide, serious injuries, very serious injuries, robbery, robbery with deprivation of liberty (hijacking), extortion, kidnapping and rape, as well as for other crimes indicated by law.

In criminal proceedings against minors under eighteen years of age, the acting Court may admit the lack of sufficient maturity or discernment as an excuse or mitigation.

The records of adolescents who have been in conflict with criminal law will not be destroyed and will be considered in criminal proceedings to which they may be subjected after their sixteenth birthday.

The commission of crimes, using the participation of children and adolescents, will be especially punished”.

“Transitory and special provision B. The State will ensure the existence of a Decentralized Service dedicated exclusively to the hospitalization and rehabilitation of delinquents under the age of eighteen, and must provide it with the necessary resources for its operation.

This Decentralized Service will be subject to special monitoring in which the Parliamentary Penitentiary Commissioner will participate”.

Article 2. This constitutional reform will take effect immediately, once the result of the approval plebiscite has been proclaimed.

Electoral history

From the centuryXX. the Colorado Party participated in all elections. In 1976 and 1981 there was no elections, as it would have been, because the country was in the hands of the civic-military dictatorship.

Relevant members of the Colorado Party

Among the relevant members of the party are: Fructuoso Rivera, Joaquín Suárez, Venancio Flores, Lorenzo Batlle, Juan Idiarte Borda, Julio Herrera y Obes, José Batlle y Ordóñez, Domingo Arena, Pedro Manini Ríos, Baltasar Brum, Julio César Grauert, Héctor Grauert, Tomás Berreta, Luis Batlle Berres, Lorenzo Batlle Pacheco, Jorge Pacheco Areco, Manuel Flores Mora, Amílcar Vasconcellos, Pedro Bordaberry, Luis Hierro Gambardella, Julio María Sanguinetti, Jorge Batlle, Luis Hierro López, Ope Pasquet Iribarne, Manuel Flores Silva, Germán Coutinho, José Amorín Batlle, Tabaré Viera, among others.

Municipalities

The Colorado Party is in charge of the administration of the Municipality of Rivera.

Authorities

2004-2009

The Colorado Party is led by the National Executive Committee (CEN). In the National Convention held in September 2004, list 1, an agreement between the Batllista Forum and List 15 and headed by Julio María Sanguinetti, obtained a large majority for the CEN election: 12 positions out of 15. For its part, the Unión Colorada y Batllista led by Alberto Iglesias, with 22 conventional votes, obtained 71 votes and two seats in the CEN, while Ope Pasquet's Open Batllismo, with only two conventional votes, received 33 votes and won a seat in the Executive. The General Secretariat was left in charge of Julio María Sanguinetti and only one woman, Glenda Rondán, was a member of the CEN in the 2004-2009 period.

2009 onwards

At the National Convention held on September 12, 2009, the Vamos Uruguay sector obtained 10 of the 15 members of the National Executive Committee. In turn, List 15 obtained two positions, the Uruguay is Possible sector of Alberto Iglesias another two and the Batllista Forum one. Pedro Bordaberry was elected the party's new general secretary for the period 2009-2014. Julio María Sanguinetti will no longer integrate the CEN for the first time in 40 years. Neither will former President Jorge Batlle.

In this way, the CEN Colorado is made up of: Pedro Bordaberry, Cristina Ergas, Martha Montaner, Walter Riesgo, Juan Justo Amaro, Pablo Ferrari, Celmar Panichini, Max Sapolinsky, Germán Cardoso, Alberto Iglesias, Ope Pasquet, Roberto Yavarone, Germán Coutinho, Eduardo Malaquina and Yeanneth Puñales.

In April 2011, Bordaberry implemented a new system in which the position of general secretary rotated. He was replaced in the General Secretariat by Ope Pasquet; and, a year later, Martha Montaner took her place, becoming the first female general secretary in the party's history. In turn, she was succeeded by Adrián Peña.

News

In 2018 the Ciudadanos sector was founded, headed by Ernesto Talvi. This economist was anointed the sole candidate for the presidency for the 2019 elections. Facing the ballot in November of that year, Talvi supports Luis Lacalle Pou against Daniel Martínez Villamil, winning the first. This leads Lacalle Pou to form a government coalition with other parties in order to govern, of which the Colorado Party is a part.

Currently, the Colorado Party holds several public positions in the coalition government: ministries, public companies, sub-secretaries, etc. But after the resignation of Ernesto Talvi, anointed chancellor, to participate in political activity and the age of Julio María Sanguinetti, who took over as general secretary in 2019, the Colorado Party does not have clear candidates for the upcoming 2024 elections. This has caused several leaders to turn again to the figure of Pedro Bordaberry, retired from politics, despite Bordaberry's refusal to return according to some sources. This has caused other names to emerge as possible candidates for 2024, such such as Gabriel Gurméndez, Andrés Ojeda, Robert Silva, Adrián Peña, Gustavo Zubía, Carmen Sanguinetti, Ope Pasquet or the OAS Secretary General Luis Almagro.

In 2022 the Party has resumed a policy of reopening the historic zone clubs according to the neighborhoods of Montevideo.

Elective positions of the Colorado Party

Period 2015-2020

Senators

  • Pedro Bordaberry (Come Uruguay)
  • Germán Coutinho (Come Uruguay)
  • José Amorín Batlle (ProBa)
  • Martha Montaner (1955 - 2016, Come on Uruguay)

Deputies

  • Graciela Matiaude
  • Germán Cardoso (Maldonado)
  • Conrado Rodríguez (Montevideo)
  • Walter Verri (Paysandú)
  • Cecilia Eguiluz (Salto)
  • Valentina Rapela (Montevideo)
  • Ope Pasquet (Montevideo)
  • Tabaré Viera (Rivera)
  • Adrián Peña (Canelones)
  • Susana Montaner (Tacuarembó)
  • Nibia Reisch (Colonia)

Period 2010-2015

Senators

  • Pedro Bordaberry (Come Uruguay)
  • Germán Coutinho (Come Uruguay)
  • Ope Pasquet (Come on Uruguay)
  • José Amorín Batlle (ProBa)
  • Tabaré Viera (ProBa)

Deputies

  • Gustavo Espinosa (Canelones)
  • Graciela Matiaude
  • Daniel Bianchi (Colony)
  • Germán Cardoso (Maldonado)
  • Conrado Rodríguez (Montevideo)
  • Fernando Amado (Montevideo)
  • Fitzgerald Cantero (Montevideo)
  • Juan Manuel Garino (Montevideo)
  • Aníbal Gloodtdofsky (Montevideo)
  • Oscar Magurno (Montevideo)
  • Alma Mallo (Montevideo)
  • Juan Ángel Vázquez (Montevideo)
  • Walter Verri (Paysandú)
  • Marne Osorio (Rivera)
  • Cecilia Eguiluz (Salto)
  • Gustavo Cersósimo (San José)
  • José Amy (Soriano)
  • Martha Montaner (Tacuarembó)

Political groups that make up the Colorado Party

2019 election slogans

  • Citizens
  • Batllists
Third track

National election lists 2019

List Sector Figures of the Sector
List 600CitizensErnesto Talvi
List 15List 15José amorin Batlle
List 2000Batllistas (2018)Julio María Sanguinetti
Ready 9007 Third track Gustavo Zubía

2014 internal election lists

List Logo Group Figures of the Group
List 99Yamandú Fau
List 321Uruguay is Possible
Alberto Iglesias
List 360
List 505
List 513Colorados Independent Batllistas de LavallejaDaniel Pareira Emilio Cáceres Raúl Cáceres
List 815Jorge Batlle Walter Antuña
List 919
List 1000Building Uruguay
List 1003
DorotheergasseBatllista Unit
List 1011Come on.Martin Aguirrezabala
List 1013
List 1014
List 1015
List 1030
List 1050
List 1084
List 1085
List 1122Creating Future
List 1520
List 1870Pablo Deandrea
List 1915Pilar BatllistaJorge Batlle
Gonzalo Secco
List 2092Abel Duarte
List 3010
List 10000
List of 10101
List 10222
List 10520
101010
List 102000
List 123456Battle PassionWashington Abdala
List 152222Jorge Batlle
Daniel García
10101010

Latest voting intention polls

  • See: Internal Elections of Uruguay 2019
  • See: Uruguay's presidential elections of 2019

Election results

Legislative elections

Election Deputies Senators
Votes % of votes Scalls Position Votes % of votes Scalls Position
1938 (PC) 219,311
61.40 %
64/99
Majority 219,311
61.40 %
15/30
Majority given by the Vice-President
1942 (PC) 309,630
53.88 %
58/99
Majority 309,630
53.88 %
19/30
Majority
1946 (PC) 310.496
47.81 %
47/99
Minority 310.496
47.81 %
15/30
Majority given by the Vice-President
1950 (PC) 433.454
52.61 %
53/99
Majority 433.454
52.61 %
17/30
Majority
1954 (PC) 444.429
50.55 %
51/99
Majority 444.429
50.55 %
17/31
Majority
1958 (PC) 379,062
37.70 %
38/99
Minority 379,062
37.70 %
12/31
Minority
1962 (PC) 521.231
44.51 %
43/99
Minority 521.231
44.51 %
14/31
Minority
1966 (PC) 607,633
49.33 %
50/99
Majority 607,633
49.33 %
16/30
Majority
1971 (PC) 681,624
40.96 %
41/99
First minority 681,624
40.96 %
13/30
First minority
1984 (PC) 777,701
41,22 %
41/99
First minority 777,701
41,22 %
13/30
First minority
1989 (PC) 596.964
30.10 %
30/99
Minority 596.964
30.10 %
9/30
Minority
1994 (PC) 656,428
32.35 %
32/99
First minority 656,428
32.35 %
10/30
First minority with the National Party
1999 (PC) 703 915
32.8 %
33/99
Minority 703 915
32.8 %
10/30
Minority
2004 (PC) 231,036
10.61 %
10/99
Minority 231,036
10.61 %
3/30
Minority
2009 (PC) 392,307
17.02 %
17/99
Minority 392,307
17.02 %
5/30
Minority
2014 (PC) 305,699
12,89 %
13/99
Minority 305,699
12,89 %
4/30
Minority
2019 (PC) 300,177
12.34 %
13/99
Minority 300,177
12.34 %
4/30
Minority

Presidential Elections

Election Candidates Political group First round Outcome
Votes to the candidate % Votes to the party %
1922 José Serrato 123,279 50.05% 123,279 50.05% SíYes. electorate
1926 Juan Campisteguy 97.475 33.71% 141,553 48.96% SíYes. electorate
Julio María Sosa 43.929 15.19% NoNo. electorate
1930 Gabriel Terra 136.832 42.93% 165.827 520.02% SíYes. electorate
Pedro Manini Rios 28,882 9.06% NoNo. electorate
Federico Fleurquin 8,340 2.62 per cent NoNo. electorate
1938 Alfredo Baldomir 121,259 33.95% 219,311 61.40% SíYes. electorate
Eduardo Blanco Acevedo 97.998 27.43% NoNo. electorate
1942 Juan José de Amézaga S/DNo data309,630 53.88% SíYes. electorate
Eduardo Blanco Acevedo S/DNo dataNoNo. electorate
Eugenio Lagarmilla S/DNo dataNoNo. electorate
1946 Tomas Berreta 185.715 27.71% 310.496 46.33% SíYes. electorate
Rafael Schiaffino 83.534 12.46% NoNo. electorate
Alfredo Baldomir 40.875 6.10% NoNo. electorate
1950 Andrés Martínez Trueba 161.262 19.58% 433.454 52.61% SíYes. electorate
Cesar Mayo Gutiérrez 150.930 18.32% NoNo. electorate
Eduardo Blanco Acevedo 120.949 14.68 per cent NoNo. electorate
Election Candidates to the National Council of Government Political group First round Outcome
Votes to the list % Votes to the party %
1954 Luis Batlle Berres, Alberto Fermín Zubiría, Arturo Lezama,
Carlos Fischer, Justino Zavala Muniz, Zoilo Chelle
List 15 254,648 28.96% 444.429 50.55% SíYes. electorate

6 counts for the majority

Orestes Lanza, Eduardo Acevedo Álvarez, Giordano Bruno Eccher,
Daniel Castellanos, Álvaro Correa Moreno, Federico García Capurro
List 14 180,164 20.49% NoNo. electorate
César Charlone, Roberto Barreira, Manuel Troncoso,
Carlos Vilaró Rubio, Arsenio Bargo, Juan Rodríguez López
Coloured and Battleship Union 9,292 1.06% NoNo. electorate
1958 Manuel Rodríguez Correa, Ledo Arroyo Torres, Héctor Grauert,
Amílcar Vasconcellos, Julio C. Estrella, Armando I. Barbieri
List 15 215,881 21.47 per cent 379,062 37.70% SíYes. electorate

2 minority charges

César Batlle Pacheco, Luis A. Brause, Juan P. Fabini,
Orestes Lanza, Andrés Martínez Trueba, Armando Malet
List 14 154,110 15.33% SíYes. electorate

1 position by minority

Washington Fernández, Eduardo Jiménez de Aréchaga,
Carlos A. Surraco, Juan Enrique Llovet, Ceibal Artigas, Felisindo Castro
Batllista Unit 8.514 0.85% NoNo. electorate
1962 Luis Batlle Berres, Amílcar Vasconcellos, Alberto Abdala,
José Acquistapace, Julio Lacarte Muró, Enrique Rodríguez Fabregat
List 15 277,259 23.68% 521.231 44,51% SíYes. electorate

2 minority charges

Óscar Gestido, Augusto Legnani, Carlos Manini Rios,
Tabaré Berreta, Esteban Rostagnol Bein, Carlos Viana Aranguren
Coloured and Battleship Union 167,085 14.27 per cent SíYes. electorate

1 position by minority

Zelmar Michelini, Renán Rodríguez, Esteban Campal,
Delfos Roche, Luis I. Garibaldi, Ceibal Artigas
List 99 76.510 6.53% NoNo. electorate
Election Candidates Political group First round Outcome
Votes to the candidate % Votes to the party %
1966 Óscar Gestido 262,040 21.27 per cent 607,633 49.33% SíYes. electorate
Jorge Batlle List 15 215,642 17.5% NoNo. electorate
Amílcar Vasconcellos 77,476 6.29% NoNo. electorate
Zelmar Michelini 48,022 3,90% NoNo. electorate
Justino Jiménez de Aréchaga 4,064 0.333% NoNo. electorate
1971 Juan María Bordaberry National Reelection Union 379.515 21.97 per cent 681,624 40.96% SíYes. electorate
Jorge Batlle List 15 242,804 14.06% NoNo. electorate
Amílcar Vasconcellos List 315 48.839 2.83 per cent NoNo. electorate
Juan Luis Pintos 5,402 0.31% NoNo. electorate
Juan Pedro Ribas 4.025 0.23% NoNo. electorate
1984 Julio María Sanguinetti UK Battleship - List 15 592,061 30.67% 777,701 41.22% SíYes. electorate
Jorge Pacheco Areco Coloured and Battleship Union 183,801 9.52% NoNo. electorate
1989 Jorge Batlle List 15 291,944 14.20 % 596.964 30.10% NoNo. electorate
Jorge Pacheco Areco Coloured and Battleship Union 289,222 14.06 % NoNo. electorate
Hugo Fernández Faingold Battle Forum 14,482 0.70 % NoNo. electorate
1994 Julio María Sanguinetti Battle Forum 500.767 23.59% 656,428 32.35% SíYes. electorate
Jorge Batlle List 15 102.551 4.83 % NoNo. electorate
Jorge Pacheco Areco Coloured and Battleship Union 51.936 2.45 % NoNo. electorate
Jorge Barreiro 227 0.01% NoNo. electorate
Election Candidates Political group First round Second round Outcome
Votes % Votes %
1999 Jorge Batlle List 15 703.915 32.80% 1,158,708 54.13% SíYes. electorate
2004 Guillermo Stirling Battle Forum 231,036 10.61% NoNo. electorate
2009 Pedro Bordaberry Come on. 392,307 17.02% NoNo. electorate
2014 Pedro Bordaberry Come on. 305,699 12.89% NoNo. electorate
2019 Ernesto Talvi Citizens 300,177 12.34% NoNo. electorate

Internal elections

Election Precandidates Political group Votes % Votes to the party Outcome
1999 Jorge Batlle List 15 264,770 54.92% 482,088 SíYes. elected as candidate
Luis Hierro López Battle Forum 212,777 44.14% NoNo. electorate
Victor Vaillant List 27 2,157 0.45% NoNo. electorate
Federico Bouza New Option 1.646 0.34% NoNo. electorate
César Cabrera Entrepreneurship 738 0.15 per cent NoNo. electorate
2004 Guillermo Stirling Battle Forum 144.997 91.0% 159,223 SíYes. elected as candidate
Alberto Iglesias Coloured and Battleship Union 10,881 6.8% NoNo. electorate
Ricardo Lombardo Independent Renewal Force 2.029 1.3% NoNo. electorate
Manuel Flores Silva Corriente Batllista Independiente 1,187 0.7 per cent NoNo. electorate
Gustavo Boquete Uruguayan political renewal 74 0.07% NoNo. electorate
Eisenhower Cardoso For a better society 55 0.04% NoNo. electorate
Jorge Ruiz Garateguy 33 Eastern Movement 0 0.0% NoNo. electorate
2009 Pedro Bordaberry Come on. 92.726 71.20% 128.422 SíYes. elected as candidate
José Amorín Batlle List 15 19,000 14.79% NoNo. electorate
Luis Hierro López Battle Forum 15,474 12.05% NoNo. electorate
Daniel Lamas Renewal and Change 1,115 0.87% NoNo. electorate
Pedro Etchegaray Marking the Rumbo 58 0.05% NoNo. electorate
Eisenhower Cardoso For a Better Society 49 0.04% NoNo. electorate
2014 Pedro Bordaberry Come on. 103,142 73.62% 140,099 SíYes. elected as candidate
José Amorín Batlle List 15 36,310 25.92% NoNo. electorate
Manuel Flores Silva Ala Batllista 497 0.35 % NoNo. electorate
2019 Ernesto Talvi Citizens 99.280 53.72% 184,819 SíYes. elected as candidate
Julio María Sanguinetti Batllists 60.635 32.81% NoNo. electorate
José Amorín Batlle List 15 24,487 13.25 per cent NoNo. electorate
Edgardo Martínez Zimarioff Colored option 188 0.10% NoNo. electorate
Pedro Etchegaray Marking the Rumbo 46 0.025% NoNo. electorate
José González Querio Transformer 3 0.0016% NoNo. electorate
Más resultados...
Tamaño del texto:
undoredo
format_boldformat_italicformat_underlinedstrikethrough_ssuperscriptsubscriptlink
save